Thursday morning I arrived for my last instructional day of the school year. It would be the end of my 18th year of teaching; my 9th straight year of teaching Kindergarten in California. It would be my last day teaching Kindergarten, and my last day before having a Kindergartner at school with me! In the Fall (late Summer) I will be teaching a new grade level. Not just a new grade level to me; but an entirely new grade level in the state of California. Known as Transitional Kindergarten, or "TK", it is meant to be a bridge between preschool and Kindergarten, the initial year of a two-year Kindergarten program. A hybrid of Pre-K and Early or Young K, students in TK will have birthdays between Sept. 2 and Dec. 1, 2009. That's right, folks. EVERY child in my class next year will celebrate their 5th birthday in either September, October, or November. Hmmm.
Now, in my personal philosophy of education birthdates would not be determinants of learning levels.
Even so, I remember my shock and dismay in August, 2005 when I learned that my youngest student would be turning 5 on December 1st of that year; I would be teaching (a) 4 year old(s) for literally FOUR months into the school year! Unheard of! What was California thinking? So, a few years later, they passed an initiative and a timeline was put into place to change the K entrance eligibility date from Dec. 1 to Sept. 1 over a three year period, scaling back one month at at time. Sounds logical, right?
This past year, then, the deadline was Oct. 1. Students born between Sept. 1 and Oct. 1 could select to be in TK or K; students born Oct. 2- Dec. 1 would be placed in K. My youngest student's birthday this year? Oct. 1.
Now I have been a proponent or a two year K program for years. Why not give our youngest the gift of time instead of calling it "retention"? The Kindergarten retention form at my school is even called "Kindergarten Continuance Form". Why the social stigma? I have advocated multi-age early childhood classrooms where children move on when THEY are ready, not when numbers on a piece of paper demand.
Some of my future architects and engineers at work.
Understandably many Californians do not have a clear understanding of TK. The lines are blurred; the curriculum fuzzy at best. Next Monday and Tuesday I will meet with the TK teachers in my district; we have ten schools, and each school has one TK classroom (in some cases two from what I understand). We will work on block plans and lessons for next Fall, the first full implementation of Transitional Kindergarten in the state. Many friends with TK age children are opting to keep them in preschool one more year when they can comfortably afford it. Others are enrolling in public TKs with faith and hope. Some are concerned that it will not challenge their Kindergarten-ready students.
The questions are many.
Can students with no preschool background and/or low level skills and August (or summer?) birthdays also be enrolled? (According to the CDE website apparently this is a local decision.)
Can students with readiness skills in place (all letters and sounds etc.) who are not age-eligible for K be moved into K? (Sounds like this is not preferable, not clear if it is possible.)
It is my hope that I can create a developmental, constructivist, nature-based, inquiry based program with plenty of kinesthetic pre-writing activities (painting, lacing, clay, gardening etc.) There will be a few obstacles to surmount:
At this time the ratio is 24:1.
At this time I am indicated as a split level TK/K with 19 TK students and 5 K students.
At this time I will have a curriculum specialist for approximately 45-60 minutes or my 3 1/2 hour day with the students.
I look forward with both bubbling anticipation and trepidation as I take on this new phase of my career.
I am excited by the possibilities to return to the movement based, exploration and discovery based sense of early childhood development as a foundation for academic concepts in all academic areas (most especially literacy, number sense and the arts/sciences). I am cautious because there will be a sense of isolation with only one TK per site and limited opportunities for communication and collaboration with grade level colleagues. (I am used to daily exchange of materials, ideas, and resources with my K team. I will still be located physically with them and we will continue to support each other in our practice, but our days will be less aligned than before.)
All in all, I am considering this 19th year in education as pivotal in my career; as I navigate both a new grade level and our second year of Common Core, along with my first year as a parent of a public school student, I will either flow along easily with the current or be caught in the undertow.